The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is preparing to vote on a proposal that could reshape how electronic devices are tested before reaching U.S. consumers. Set for May 22, 2025, the decision would determine whether certain foreign labs — particularly those based in China—will be restricted from participating in the equipment authorization process required for electronics that emit radio frequencies. This move is driven by growing concerns about national security, especially as some of these labs are affiliated with companies previously flagged as threats. The FCC argues that devices approved for U.S. markets should be certified only by entities that are free from foreign influence or ties to adversarial governments.
Targeting High-Risk Labs and Expanding Oversight
Under the new rules, any laboratory associated with firms listed on the FCC’s “Covered List” would be barred from testing electronics for U.S. approval. This includes well-known Chinese companies such as Huawei, ZTE, Hikvision, Dahua, and Hytera—each previously identified by the U.S. government as potential security risks. The FCC plans to revoke recognition of any labs tied to these entities, preventing them from certifying products for use within the country.
Additionally, the agency is seeking public input on whether these restrictions should go further—possibly including all labs located in countries considered foreign adversaries. This broader approach would help address concerns that some organizations, while not directly named, may still operate under the influence of hostile governments.
Transparency, Domestic Investment, and Industry Impact
A second proposal from the FCC would require companies with ties to foreign adversaries to disclose all FCC-issued licenses and certifications they hold. This added layer of transparency is aimed at increasing accountability and improving public trust in how electronic devices are regulated. In the long term, the FCC also plans to explore ways to expand domestic testing infrastructure to reduce dependence on foreign facilities altogether.
These regulatory efforts are a continuation of the Secure Equipment Act of 2021, which already prohibited approvals of certain foreign-made telecommunications equipment. Now, with a focus on who actually tests and certifies devices, the FCC hopes to close a critical loophole in national tech oversight. Industry reactions are mixed—while some applaud the stronger stance on security, others warn of delays and complications in global supply chains if the rules are implemented.
What Happens Next
The FCC has opened a public comment period ahead of its late May vote, encouraging feedback from manufacturers, cybersecurity experts, lawmakers, and consumers. Many are watching closely to see how far the restrictions will extend and whether the commission will choose a targeted approach or a broader policy affecting all labs in adversarial countries.
If passed, these new rules could alter the way electronic devices are certified for the U.S. market, influencing everything from global supply chains to international trade relationships. The outcome may also signal how aggressive the U.S. intends to be in defending its technology infrastructure in a time of rising geopolitical tension.
